diff doc/devel/versions.txt @ 0:13d2b8934445

Import AnaGram (near-)release tree into Mercurial.
author David A. Holland
date Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:52:45 -0500
parents
children 12171da8943f
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/doc/devel/versions.txt	Sat Dec 22 17:52:45 2007 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+Theory of AG version numbers (as of 20060806, updated 20070603, 20070613)
+
+
+ - Any version of AG has a "base version number". This is 2.01 for
+2.01, 2.40 for the first public open source version, 2.50 for the
+stable open source version, and 3.00 for the first GTK version,
+whenever that appears. This version goes into the Windows registry.
+
+ - Development snapshots leading up to the first release with a
+particular base version number are numbered with the new base version,
+a dash, and the date or a release candidate number. Examples:
+2.40-20070610; 2.40-RC2.
+
+ - Stable versions have the base version followed by a dot and the
+build number, aka patchlevel. For example: 2.40.01.
+
+ - Every changeset committed to the stable branch causes a new build
+and increments the build number. Needless to say, you don't commit to
+the stable branch lightly.
+
+ - A development version built directly from a CVS or Mercurial
+working directory will be numbered 2.40-current, because it's difficult or
+impossible to ascertain the proper date. Assuming the proper date is
+even well defined.
+
+ - A stable version built directly from a CVS or Mercurial working
+directory will be numbered 2.40.01-current.
+
+ - If we set up anoncvs, which if properly managed is equivalent to
+issuing a devel snapshot every night, it should be possible to inject
+the date.
+